Enter | Registry | Forgot your password? | Feedback

2019/4(19)


CONTENTS

Use of the heritage

Gusеv S., Zаgorulko А. 

Thе divеrsity of thе sitеs (plаcеs of mеmory) of Russiа. Pаrt 1: Cеntrаl Fеdеrаl District of thе Russiаn Fеdеrаtion 

Nelzina O. 

Using the historical and cultural potential of the territory in organizing thematic historical parks of the value-semantic matrix of Russia: external actors of destruction


Underwater cultural heritage

Vedernikov Yu. 

Submarine No. 2: history of creation and loss, prospects of acquisition

Aleksakhina V.

Museum of the History of the Russian Submarine Forces named after A.I. Marinesco and its role in the socio-cultural space of the Kalinin district of St. Petersburg


Russian foreign heritage

Elchaninov A. 

Miklouho-Maclay and Russian place names on the map of Papua New Guinea


Historical Research

Petrova El. 

Soviet constructivism 


Applied Research

Mulenko I.

On the role of decoration in the attribution of bronze bells of Russian production

Selezneva El.

 Innovative competencies in educational strategies to improve professional skills


Archives

Bespalova T., Lariontsev M.

National memory, service and borders of Russian civilization

Abstract. The article raises the problem of a new philosophical and political interpretation of civilizational theory as the basis of state management in the context of modern political reality. The historical memory, common linguistic and cultural space of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus, conflicts on the faults of civilization (the borders of the former national republics – Transdniestria, Donbass) return Russian politics to the space of rethinking the “borders” of Russian civilization. The theory of N.Ya. Danilevsky’s cultural and historical types, the interpretation of political patriotism by the philosopher in favor of the people’s one, sets a special understanding of Russian civilization and the role of national memory in preserving the civilizational community. The scientific novelty of the work is the designation of the mechanisms of inheritance of Russian culture (in continuation of I.A. Ilyin’s ideas) in connection with domestic patriotic practices and the corresponding design of collective memories/defaults, which conceptually can be considered as ways of formation of the Russian national identity and preservation of the Russian civilization.

Key words: borders of Russian civilization, civilizational theory, state management, cultural-historical type, national memory, mechanisms of inheritance of Russian culture.

Bespalova Tatyana Vladimirovna,

D. in Philosophy,

Russian Scientific Research Institute for Cultural and Natural Heritage named after

D.Likhachev (Moscow),

e-mail: info@ heritage-institute.ru

Lariontsev Mikhail Mikhailovich,

PhD in Cultural studies,

Russian Scientific Research Institute for Cultural and Natural Heritage named after

D.Likhachev (Moscow),

e-mail: info@ heritage-institute.ru


Published: The Heritage Institute Journal, 2018/2(13)

URL: http://nasledie-journal.ru/en/journals/221.html


Founder

Russian Scientific Research
Institute for Cultural
and Natural Heritage
named after D.Likhachev


Publisher

Russian Scientific Research
Institute for Cultural
and Natural Heritage
named after D.Likhachev


Certificate

of the Mass information media
registration:
ЭЛ № ФС 77–60211,
date: 17.12.2014


Frequency

4 issues per year

Published online only


PARTNERS


Journal of Cultural Research



Рейтинг@Mail.ru