Enter | Registry | Forgot your password? | Feedback

2026/2(45)

Contents


HISTORICAL RESEARCH

Zubov D.

Occupation Regime and
Nazi Criminals in the Krasnodar Region (1942-1943): An Analysis
of Eyewitness Testimonies


APPLIED RESEARCH

Vadatursky D.

On the spread of stone architecture in the Arctic region. Construction
of a cathedral in the Sumskoy Fortress


Vasiliev G.

Art project “My Contemporaries”: аxiological foundations


Latushko Yu.

Traditional water transport
of the Amur basin


Nikolaev K.

Authorial repetition and copy
in the creative practice of Vladimir painters of the 1980s - 1990s (based on the archive of GOSNIIR
Scientific Expertise Department)


Ippolitov S.

Formation and development
of copyright in China: from doctrine to instruments of state cultural policy


HERITAGE PRESERVATION

Kochkin S.

Study of the X-ray of “Landscape. Pargolovo” by Fyodor Vasilyev
(the Radischev Art Museum, Saratov)


Lysenko A.

Cultural transmission mechanisms and modes in the context of historical development of the Stronsky artistic dynasty


Molodin A.

Digital twin as an object of protection of lost heritage


Filin P.

Chukotka baidara: technology and the preservation of traditions. Experience building an Eskimo baidara in the village of Sireniki
in 2025


Song Yuhan

Historical practices and conceptual evolution in the conservation
of China's large archaeological sites


MUSEOLOGY

Makarova E.

Tainitskaya Tower of the Nizhny Novgorod Kremlin: historical and architectural review


Mikhalskaya O., Chuvilkina Yu.

Contribution of collector Felix Evgenievich Vishnevsky to the development of Russian museum collections


Shimanova M.

Biblical scenes on an 18th century tiled stove of the Novodevichy convent in Moscow





Publ. 04/05/2026


Archives

DOI 10.34685/HI.2020.13.93.004

Filippov Yu., Somov V.

Falsification of history as a threat to national security

Abstract. In the context of the international situation, the falsification of history should be viewed as a threat to national security. The possibility of countering the falsification of history with the help of administrative coercion is absent. The only way to solve the problem is to increase the authority of history as a science. Respect for one’s own history is possible only by increasing the authority of historians. The fight against plagiarism, the low level of scientific work, interest, first of all, in studying the history of Russia – these are the main directions of the necessary development of modern historical thought from the point of view of national security.

Achieving success in these areas without the support of the state is difficult. The social status of the historian must correspond to the level of the state’s claims to historical sovereignty. Only by creating favorable (including economic and domestic) working conditions of the scientific historical community, the state will be able to achieve the desired result – preserving traditional spiritual and moral values and countering the falsification of history.

Key words: russian history, education and upbringing, national security.

Filippov Yuri Vladimirovich,
D. in Pedagogy,
general director, Nizhny Novgorod State Historical and Architectural
museum reserve (Nizhny Novgorod),
e-mail: rurik_fil@mail.ru

Somov Vladimir Aleksandrovich,
D. in History,
Volga branch of the Russian State University of Justice (Nizhny Novgorod),
e-mail: somoff33@yandex.ru

Published: The Heritage Institute Journal, 2020/2(21)

URL: http://nasledie-journal.ru/en/journals/366.html


Founder

Likhachev Russian Research
Institute for Cultural
and Natural Heritage

Publisher

Likhachev Russian Research
Institute for Cultural
and Natural Heritage

Certificate

of the Mass information media
registration:
ЭЛ № ФС 77–60211,
date: 17.12.2014


Frequency

4 issues per year

Published on-line only


PARTNERS


cc-by


Journal of Cultural Research



Рейтинг@Mail.ru