2026/1(44)
Contents
HISTORICAL RESEARCH
Stylistic features of the Stroganov' glassblowing plastics of the 1960s - 1980s
History of the horse-breeding portrait as a utilitarian genre in the traditions of Russian art of the late
XVIII - XIX centuries
“Expedition in Time and Space”
on Lake Onega
Military education of servicemen of the Russian army in the second half of the 19th century – early
20th century: historical experience, lessons
INTANGIBLE CULTURAL HERITAGE
I.A. Ilyin on Pushkin's heritage
and the antitheses of its interpretation
Yalta branch of the Crimean State Philharmonic in the cultural
and historical retrospective
of development
HERITAGE PRESERVATION
Tourism as a factor in preserving
the unique cultural heritage of
the Kenozersky National Park
Reconstruction vs «Disneyification» of cultural heritage
Patterns of non-governmental digital heritage preservation in Russia
Current problems of the actuel system of protected zones for cultural heritage sites in Russia
Experience of preserving authentic winemaking as part of the cultural heritage of the region (based on
the material of the Spanish movement of «terroirists»)
MUSEOLOGY
Memorial landscape on the coast
of the Sea of Azov: the first steps to organize a museum complex in the
homeland of Fedor Konyukhov
Prerequisites for the emergence
and features of the functioning
of museums of Russian writers
in the CIS member states
Role of volunteers in preserving landscape art, using the example
of estate complexes in central Russia
REVIEWS
»Archaeology of the Russian Arctic»: book review
Publ. 10/02/2026
Archives
DOI 10.34685/HI.2020.13.93.004
Filippov Yu., Somov V.
Falsification of history as a threat to national security
Abstract. In the context of the international situation, the falsification of history should be viewed as a threat to national security. The possibility of countering the falsification of history with the help of administrative coercion is absent. The only way to solve the problem is to increase the authority of history as a science. Respect for one’s own history is possible only by increasing the authority of historians. The fight against plagiarism, the low level of scientific work, interest, first of all, in studying the history of Russia – these are the main directions of the necessary development of modern historical thought from the point of view of national security.
Achieving success in these areas without the support of the state is difficult. The social status of the historian must correspond to the level of the state’s claims to historical sovereignty. Only by creating favorable (including economic and domestic) working conditions of the scientific historical community, the state will be able to achieve the desired result – preserving traditional spiritual and moral values and countering the falsification of history.
Key words: russian history, education and upbringing, national security.
Filippov Yuri Vladimirovich,
D. in Pedagogy,
general director, Nizhny Novgorod State Historical and Architectural
museum reserve (Nizhny Novgorod),
e-mail: rurik_fil@mail.ru
Somov Vladimir Aleksandrovich,
D. in History,
Volga branch of the Russian State University of Justice (Nizhny Novgorod),
e-mail: somoff33@yandex.ru
Published: The Heritage Institute Journal, 2020/2(21)
URL: http://nasledie-journal.ru/en/journals/366.html
Founder
Likhachev Russian Research
Institute for Cultural
and Natural Heritage
Publisher
Likhachev Russian Research
Institute for Cultural
and Natural Heritage
Certificate
of the Mass information mediaregistration:
ЭЛ № ФС 77–60211,
date: 17.12.2014
Frequency
4 issues per year
Published on-line only
PARTNERS
