2024/1(36)
special issue
TOMSKAYA PISANITSA
Research materials
Abolonkova I., Zayatdinov D., Novokreshchenova K., Yudnikova A., Rayko G.
Experience of geomechanical monitoring of Tomskaya Pisanitsa in 2022–2023
Prospects for nomination of ‘The Tom River region Rock Art’ to the World Heritage List“Tomskaya Pisanitsa” Museum-Reserve: returning from a “museum cultural” to a “repository of cultural heritage objects”
The Lower Tom Rock Art Centre
Moor N., Abolonkova I., Goryaev V., Seletsky M., Onishchenko S.
Preliminary results of studying archaeological context of Tomskaya Pisanitsa
History of conservation and museumification of rock art sites
on the Tom River based on records from the State Archive of Kuzbass
Old Russian settlements and villages of the proposed place of interest “Tom Rock Ar
Sazanova K., Zelenskaya M., Vlasov D.
Methodological approaches to the protection of archaeological sites
of the Tom River region from biological damage
Lithic assemblage from the Pisanaya I site: preliminary results of technical and typological analysis
Geographical and floristic features
of the Tom River Basin
Publ. 15/03/2024
Archives
DOI 10.34685/HI.2020.13.93.004
Filippov Yu., Somov V.
Falsification of history as a threat to national security
Abstract. In the context of the international situation, the falsification of history should be viewed as a threat to national security. The possibility of countering the falsification of history with the help of administrative coercion is absent. The only way to solve the problem is to increase the authority of history as a science. Respect for one’s own history is possible only by increasing the authority of historians. The fight against plagiarism, the low level of scientific work, interest, first of all, in studying the history of Russia – these are the main directions of the necessary development of modern historical thought from the point of view of national security.
Achieving success in these areas without the support of the state is difficult. The social status of the historian must correspond to the level of the state’s claims to historical sovereignty. Only by creating favorable (including economic and domestic) working conditions of the scientific historical community, the state will be able to achieve the desired result – preserving traditional spiritual and moral values and countering the falsification of history.
Key words: russian history, education and upbringing, national security.
Filippov Yuri Vladimirovich,
D. in Pedagogy,
general director, Nizhny Novgorod State Historical and Architectural
museum reserve (Nizhny Novgorod),
e-mail: rurik_fil@mail.ru
Somov Vladimir Aleksandrovich,
D. in History,
Volga branch of the Russian State University of Justice (Nizhny Novgorod),
e-mail: somoff33@yandex.ru
Published: The Heritage Institute Journal, 2020/2(21)
URL: http://nasledie-journal.ru/en/journals/366.html
Founder
Russian Scientific Research
Institute for Cultural
and Natural Heritage
named after D.Likhachev
Publisher
Russian Scientific Research
Institute for Cultural
and Natural Heritage
named after D.Likhachev
Certificate
registration:
ЭЛ № ФС 77–60211,
date: 17.12.2014
Frequency
4 issues per year
Published on-line only
PARTNERS
