2025/1(40)
Contents
USE OF HERITAGE
Application of the term ‘school’ to the icon painting of Slobozhanshchyna
On the creation of a map of Russian heritage sites of the Spitsbergen archipelago: Statement of the question
HISTORICAL RESEARCH
Question of pioneering in the history of development of the Arctic
Making clay dishes in Lyskovo
in the second half of the 19th –
20th centuries
Ensuring passport regime in the Kaliningrad region in 1946–1949
HERITAGE
PRESERVATION PROBLEMS
Problems of investment
and legalization of archaeological collections
Problems of using ready-made solutions for cleaning furniture surfaces
APPLIED RESEARCH
Aesthetic and sociocultural basis
of the typology of park spaces
in the imaginative tourist attractiveness of territories
as a factor of cultural sovereignty
MUSEOLOGY
Russian writers museums in the CIS countries: to problem statement
Mikhail Pavlovich Kroshitsky: museum, painting and war
Publ. 10/03/2025
Archives
Volobuev S.
One step forward, two steps back? On the problems of scientific, methodological and educational support for the course “Foundations of Russian statehood»
Abstract. The article provides a critical analysis of the scientific, methodological and educational support of the course “Foundations of Russian Statehood”. The author demonstrates the fundamental contradictions between theoretical and methodological approaches to the formation of course content based on the concept of “worldview Pentabasis”, approved by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, and the official views of the Russian Federation on the issues of preserving the country’s civilizational identity, civil identity, all-Russian cultural identity and protection national interests. According to the author’s conclusions, these contradictions seriously affected the content of teaching aids and teaching materials published in 2023. In all manuals and educational-methodological complex there is a rollback from the official concept of the Russian state-civilization, which has an integral, synthetic character and is designed to overcome the historical differences between “Slavophiles” and “Westerners”, “soilists” and “Eurasians”, to a state of competition between various doctrines and approaches. The training course “Fundamentals of Russian Statehood” ignores or distorts generally accepted theoretical and legal approaches to understanding the phenomena of “statehood,” “nationwide code,” and “all-Russian civil identity.” It is postulated that modern Russian society does not have a historically formed identity, which has yet to be formed on the basis of “Pentabasis”. The refusal to consider the official views of the Russian Federation, expressed in strategic planning documents, as the basis of the training course is a key problem in the scientific, methodological and educational support of the course “Foundations of Russian Statehood”.
Key words: Russian Statehood, state-civilization, Russian culture, official views of the Russian Federation, Pentabasis, all-Russian civil identity, civilizational approach, cultural policy.
Volobuev Sergey Grigorievich
Senior researcher, Likhachev Russian Research Institute
for Cultural and Natural Heritage (Moscow)
Email: vlbsg@yandex.ru
Published: The Heritage Institute Journal, 2024/2(37)
URL: http://nasledie-journal.ru/en/journals/657.html
Founder
Likhachev Russian Research
Institute for Cultural
and Natural Heritage
Publisher
Likhachev Russian Research
Institute for Cultural
and Natural Heritage
Certificate
of the Mass information mediaregistration:
ЭЛ № ФС 77–60211,
date: 17.12.2014
Frequency
4 issues per year
Published on-line only
PARTNERS
