2026/3(46)
Contents
HISTORICAL RESEARCH
APPLIED RESEARCH
Significant extension to an existing property on the example of the World Heritage site ‘White monuments of Vladimir and Suzdal
Methodological approaches to working with the cultural heritage of the region in the context of the cultural and educational policy of modern Russia
Objectification as a form of digital reconstruction of lost cultural heritage in the urban environment of tourist sites Western Siberia
INTANGIBLE CULTURAL HERITAGE
CULTURAL HERITAGE STUDIES
Karbas of the 17th century. An Oransky find on the coast of Novaya Zemlya
40 years of the Marine Arctic Complex Expedition of the Heritage Institute
Shamanic ladder in the Muslim cemetery: to the semantics of the ornamented on-grave posts of the Tobol-Irtysh Tatars
Identification of immovable cultural heritage objects in Russia: conceptual, regulatory and regional aspects
HERITAGE PRESERVATION
MUSEOLOGY
School as a center for the preservation of cultural heritage: from the experience of cultural and educational activities of school museums
Publ. 18/09/2026
Archives
DOI 10.34685/HI.2026.21.71.007
Soloviev A., Berezina N.
International and foreign models for the preservation of immovable cultural heritage: a comparative legal and cultural analysis
Abstract. The article examines how foreign legal systems address the same practical problem: how to preserve the historical value of an immovable heritage property without excluding it from contemporary life. The study draws on international instruments and the legislation of France, Italy, Germany, England, Australia, and the United States. The comparison is based not on formal affiliation with a particular legal tradition, but on specific mechanisms: the distribution of powers, the legal position of property owners, procedures for approving works, community participation, and forms of financial support. The analysis shows that sustainable conservation systems are not built around a single instrument. Administrative control is effective only when combined with professional expertise, realistic obligations for owners, and economic incentives. Three analytical models are proposed to describe these combinations: protective-normative, adaptive-regulatory, and integrative. Distinguishing between them makes it possible to assess foreign experience more accurately and to avoid transferring individual legal rules outside the institutional conditions in which they operate.
Key words: immovable cultural heritage, monument protection, adaptive use, historic environment, cultural landscape, comparative law, cultural policy.
Soloviev Andrey Petrovich,
PhD in Pedagogy, Senior researcher,
Likhachev Russian Research Institute
for Cultural and Natural Heritage (Moscow)
Email: andrey476_85@mail.ru
Berezina Natalia Alexeevna,
Director of theYaroslavl Universal Scientific Library
named after N.A. Nekrasov (Yaroslavl)
Email: natalyaberezia@yandex.ru
Published: The Heritage Institute Journal, 2026/3(46)
URL: http://nasledie-journal.ru/en/journals/902.html
Founder
Likhachev Russian Research
Institute for Cultural
and Natural Heritage
Publisher
Likhachev Russian Research
Institute for Cultural
and Natural Heritage
Certificate
of the Mass information mediaregistration:
ЭЛ № ФС 77–60211,
date: 17.12.2014
Frequency
4 issues per year
Published on-line only
PARTNERS


