2026/3(46)
Contents
HISTORICAL RESEARCH
APPLIED RESEARCH
Significant extension to an existing property on the example of the World Heritage site ‘White monuments of Vladimir and Suzdal
Methodological approaches to working with the cultural heritage of the region in the context of the cultural and educational policy of modern Russia
Objectification as a form of digital reconstruction of lost cultural heritage in the urban environment of tourist sites Western Siberia
INTANGIBLE CULTURAL HERITAGE
CULTURAL HERITAGE STUDIES
Karbas of the 17th century. An Oransky find on the coast of Novaya Zemlya
40 years of the Marine Arctic Complex Expedition of the Heritage Institute
Shamanic ladder in the Muslim cemetery: to the semantics of the ornamented on-grave posts of the Tobol-Irtysh Tatars
Identification of immovable cultural heritage objects in Russia: conceptual, regulatory and regional aspects
HERITAGE PRESERVATION
MUSEOLOGY
School as a center for the preservation of cultural heritage: from the experience of cultural and educational activities of school museums
Publ. 18/09/2026
Archives
DOI 10.34685/HI.2026.49.28.003
Kader A.
RECONSTRUCTION VS «DISNEYIFICATION»
OF CULTURAL HERITAGE
Abstract. Approaches to the reconstruction of cultural heritage monuments in the context of increasing/decreasing their overall value are considered. It is noted that the value of an object can potentially be increased or decreased by reconstruction, depending on the importance attached to certain aspects – authenticity, integrity of the object, the conjugacy of the object with the place, the choice of materials, the feeling of the terrain, etc. It is concluded that the claims that reconstruction inevitably reduces the value of the object are controversial, while arguments are made in favor of abandoning reconstruction due to fears of «Disneyification» of the cultural heritage site, so making it excessively commercialized, neglecting the past, and distorting or simplifying the presentation of the culture of the past. Using the example of the cultural heritage sites of St. Petersburg, the arguments in favor of reconstruction or abandonment are considered. It is noted that there are positive aspects that determine the choice of reconstruction as a factor in increasing the value of a cultural heritage site (the Summer Garden reconstruction project), and negative aspects when reconstruction is morally problematic or unacceptable (the holographic reconstruction project of the Annunciation Church on Labor Square in St. Petersburg).
Keywords: reconstruction, integrity, authenticity, cultural heritage, renovation, Summer Garden, Annunciation Church.
Kader Amir Magid,
PhD in Pedagogy,
Associate professor, Saint-Petersburg State University
of Industrial Technologies and Design (Saint-Petersburg)
Email: amkadspb@gmail.com
Published: The Heritage Institute Journal, 2026/1(44)
URL: http://nasledie-journal.ru/en/journals/831.html
Founder
Likhachev Russian Research
Institute for Cultural
and Natural Heritage
Publisher
Likhachev Russian Research
Institute for Cultural
and Natural Heritage
Certificate
of the Mass information mediaregistration:
ЭЛ № ФС 77–60211,
date: 17.12.2014
Frequency
4 issues per year
Published on-line only
PARTNERS


